KudSiegStein: The Bagholder Bulls

11:47 am SmartGuyDH Comments

kudsiegstein.png

Investors want to maximize profits and minimize losses. However, a three-headed monster has been created to use spin and logic tricks to keep the masses buying and holding while smart money sells or goes short. This monster is none other than the financial “buy, buy, buy” bobble-head known as KudSiegStein (AKA: Larry Kudlow, Jeremy Siegel, and Ben Stein).

KudSiegStein acts in three separate parts, yet mumbles in a singular voice. No matter the details of any individual article, interview, or show episode, the main message is “buy and hold for the long run.” The science and charts behind this message are simple: over the long term, stocks rise; therefore, keep buying no matter what, and time will smooth out everything in your favor. The more rigorous web surfer can find an amazon forest’s worth of literature proving why this investing philosophy does not maximize profits, but I simply want to point out some major reasons why you should ignore these ignoramuses.

First, KudSiegStein is never accountable for anything because its time horizon is forever. If you lose money in the market, you simply didn’t live long enough to see your stocks come back. If you are a real person living in the real world, this reasoning has no practical value.

For example, let’s look at the Nasdaq 100 index ETF (QQQQ). According to KudSiegStein’s strategy you should have bought the QQQQ like clockwork every month, quarter, or year when you took your paycheck surplus and invested. Let’s say you graduated college in 1999 and bought $10,000 at the beginning of every year starting in 2000 at 90. Then you invested $10,000 in 2001 at 60, $10,000 in 2002 at 40, $10,000 in 2003 at 25, $10,000 in 2004 at 38, $10,000 in 2005 at 40, $10,000 in 2006 at 40, $10,000 in 2007 at 42, and $10,000 in 2008 at 50. Today you would have a cost basis of 47.2 and the QQQQ closed yesterday at 48.18. That’s a 2% gain over seven years!! Other indexes may have fared better, but return on investment (ROI) depends on when and in what you invest, not on a one-size-fits-all buy and hold approach.

qqqq.jpg

Second, KudSiegStein prides itself on being a red-blooded, patriotic free market capitalist, yet hypocritically begs for Federal Reserve and government stimulus. If someone has a major inconsistency in his or her guiding framework, find a new mentor. The internet has birthed an indie movement in finance for realists, so do not feel forced to swallow KudSiegStein’s manure in the mainstream media.

Third, KudSiegStein helps its elitist finance friends sell their bags to the masses when the business cycle slows or contracts. If KudSiegStein told you to sell when the smart money sold, then the market would fall much faster and KudSiegStein’s friends would lose more money than if you bought their bags on the way down. Moreover, retail brokers and finance media such as Charles Schwab (SCHW) and CNBC (GE) do much better in bull markets, so they want finance journalists pushing stocks as much as possible. Also, like all media, the finance media is tainted by press releases and publicists. Thus, KudSiegStein & Co. are not the objective market scientists they hold themselves out to be.

Fourth, KudSiegStein is comprised of a journalist (Kudlow), an academic (Siegel), and a game show host (Stein)! Kudlow is bullish because being bearish doesn’t get ratings, Siegel is pushing his ETF (Wisdom Tree Investments) and books, and Stein is making money in books and journalism too. Consequently, KudSiegStein has the tendency to get lost in theory, err in application, and be heavily biased on the bullish side. And as for the game show host, isn’t he inclined to treat your investments like a big game?

Lastly, but possibly most important, KudSiegStein has denied the housing crisis the entire way down. Only as of very recently has the permabull monster admitted issues with housing. I am not sure when interest-only “no doc” loans seemed sustainable to KudSiegStein, but such hogwash thinking discounts anything further it says about the economy or any asset market. In short, KudSiegStein’s lack of common sense has lost a lot of people a lot of money.

KudSiegStein is not completely flawed. Sometimes it has a few reasonable things to say. But don’t let its moments of reason fool you into blindly following this new age mass media monster. Otherwise you too will be a victim of the Bagholder Bulls.

SmartGuyStocks.com is holding a contest for the World’s Best KudSiegStein graphic art. Please email submissions to smartguystocks@gmail.com.

3 Responses

  1. Ron Barratt Says:

    I agree with much of what you say about the Magi bearing gifts of financial wisdom. However, if you start your analysis on 1/1/2003 (the bottom) rather than 1/1/2001, your numbers show a 28.5% increase. To me the key, is to look at your own specific portfolio and decide if your reasons to buy remain — right industry, right management, right strategy — then a down market is a great time to reinforce your earlier decision to buy. Your challenge now will be to decide when to reenter the market — and be early enough to take advantage of the early gains. You are not losing anything while holding cash but you aren’t making very much either.

  2. SmartGuyDH Says:

    Good point: the time of purchase drastically affects ROI (as I noted in the article). I use my dates in this article because every finance bull in the media uses the dates that show everyone is a winner — and that is not true.

    And you are correct about cash: holding cash for the long run is not a winning trade. But holding it for 6 months to a year and then buying banks on the cheap will be much more lucrative than putting money in the market according to some pre-arranged schedule. We have been trained to spend or invest cash ASAP, but the best investors of all time are willing to sit on it as long as it takes to find the investments that mint a fortune. For example, those willing to sit out of the market for 2 years from 2000-2002 were by far bigger winners than those who dollar cost averaged the entire time.

    Trying to figure out when to get back in the market for early gains is very hard. I prefer to have confirmation that we are moving ahead and not experiencing a fake rally. I scale into some positions if they simply cannot be beaten down any farther (and those opportunities are rare), but for the most part I prefer to miss the very early gains which are very hard to time. I’d rather go all-in with strong conviction in a confirmed market than lose money being early to the table. For example, those who bought into the market in early 2002 did awesome, but those who waited a bit longer did extraordinarily well too. But when accounting for risk (something that most people forget in hindsight), the former group was taking a much bigger gamble and could have easily been as wrong as those who were dollar cost averaging since 2000 when the market crashed.

    Thanks for the comments!! Good points!!

  3. OptioNerd Says:

    Might want to check out Stein’s website or book(s). He uses several screens to time purchases/sales such as index p/e, price/book, 10 yr bond yield/index earnings yield. My guess is these screens would not have suggested purchases of any index during the 1999-2001 periods. Not sure if he discusses this on tv. Either way, no one should invest solely on talking head’s advice.

    — A fool and his money are lucky to get together in the first place. –Gecko

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.